Paper Abstract
In 4 pages, the writer attempts to answer this very question. It is believed that in Athenian terms, Socrates was in fact, guilty of impiety and corrupting the young but that the integrity of his accusers needs to be more closely examined. Even in light of this, it is brought out that the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' did not apply in this case and moreover, Socrates admitted to his own guilt. Thus, there is no reason - from an Athenian point-of-view,- to find Socrates 'not guilty' of the charges made against him. A very well-developed argument is provided. No Bibliography.
|
|
